Dec 082010
 

The Hobson’s Bay Council recently sent out letters to objectors notifying them of the Council’s refusal of the developers proposal. The cover letter reads as follows…

Planning Permit Application No. PA1020902
6 Paine St, Newport VIC 3015
Construct four three-storey buildings comprising 46 dwellings and a reduction in on-site car parking.

After careful consideration of this application and of all objections received, it has been decided to refuse the application on the grounds listed in the enclosed Notice of Refusal to Grant a permit.

The applicant now has a right to appeal against this decision to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT). If an appeal is lodged, you will be advised by VCAT and will have a further opportunity to speak against the proposal.

Should you have any questions regarding this refusal please contact me on 03 9932 1157.

Yours faithfully
Mark Tenner
Team Leader Town Planning

Here is a copy of the refusal: Councils Refusal to Grant a Permit

This is as expected/hoped, and also as expected the developer will apply to VCAT on some grounds. You will read in the next post, that the developer has already applied to VCAT. More details of that shortly.

 Posted by at 6:41 pm
Sep 152010
 

Council have received 81 objections and is in the process of making a deliberation as to whether it will support or oppose the development at 6 Paine Street, Newport. This will take some time, as all the objections will need to be carefully considered.

All persons who lodged objections will be notified in writing as to Council’s decision.

If Council agrees to accept the developers proposal, all persons who have lodged objections will be asked to attend a Special Planning Committee at which all relevant issues will be tabled. If Council rejects the proposal, then the matter will more than likely go to VCAT. In speaking with two Councillors I get the firm impression that Council will reject the proposal….but that is only my view.

I believe that in the event Council rejects the proposal, lobbying needs to be done in order for Council to employ an outside consultant, lawyer or town planner in order to fully effect a case to oppose the development. This can be done by phoning your local Councillor or Mayor.

If the matter goes to VCAT all persons who lodged an objection will be contacted in writing and invited to attend the relevant hearing. If there is a significant response then objectors may be asked to form some consensus or group representation.

The Paine Street proposal is a microcosm of the State Government’s attitude to development in urban areas. What is of immense concern is the Government’s proposal to amend the Planning and Environment Act whereby Municipalities will have reduced ability to represent residents in matters concerning planning and development across the board. Essentially this means that developers will have more power and authority to effect development as they deem fit.

I have tried to speak with Wade Noonan regarding this matter but he’s a hard man to catch!

Regards,
Philip Henkel

Sep 022010
 

Hobsons Bay Leader has written an article. Below is the text in full…

If you view the Leader’s article on this page, you can place comments on the Leader’s website.

What the proposed property development in Paine St would look like.

A PRIME piece of Newport real estate could be converted into 46 box-shaped townhouses.

Domain Hill Property group has applied for a planning permit to turn the former Newport quarry and timber yard into three-storey apartments, fronting Paine, Crawford and Latrobe streets and Armstrong Reserve.

The site is surrounded by inter-war and Edwardian homes and the proposed designs would be in contrast to neighbouring weatherboard bungalows.

Artists’ drawings show the apartments would be a box shape, built with a mix of timber cladding and fibre cement sheeting with black finishes.

Urban designer Bryce Raworth, on behalf of Domain, wrote in a council submission that the proposed designs don’t conform with the council’s heritage policy. But it would not adversely impact on the “overall significance” of the precinct.

“These formerly industrial sites have always been distinct from their surroundings in terms of developmental character and use, and this distinction might in itself be seen to be part of the character of the immediate environs,” he wrote.

Domain managing director Peter Cahill described the design as “architecturally striking”.

“It is deliberately very contemporary and iconic,” he said.

“But we do acknowledge it being in a heritage overlay area.”

“(The overlay) is about protecting the integrity of what’s there and a new development needs to have a high level of architectural integrity.”

Mr Cahill said there was high demand to live in the timber yard precinct, as reflected in booming median house prices (Newport’s median hit $663,000 in June, up 25 per cent in the past 12 months).

What do you think of the proposal? Write to us at hobsonsbayleader.com.au

Note: The above text and images by Hobsons Bay Leader – copyright remains that of the respected owners.

 Posted by at 8:37 am
Sep 012010
 

You may wish to review the plans and lodge an objection by contacting the council. Or visit the council’s Greenlight system at www.hobsons.vic.gov.au and search for application PA1020902.

Click here to review plans and submit an objection.
Plans at are the top of the page and submitting objections are done online at the bottom of the page.

This proposal is currently with council for approval, and objections must be lodged very soon to be considered. You can object on the basis of how the development will affect you

Key factors to consider:

  • Three storey buildings plus roof top decking areas.
  • Uncomplimentary design and construction in contrast to Heritage Overlay requirements and unsympathetic  to surrounding building styles.
  • Higher and more massive than anything in the area. Minimal and zero building set-back from the footpaths.
  • Inadequate on-site parking provisions, the developer proposes residents and visitors to park in your street instead, including surrounding the Armstrong Reserve public park.
  • This development presumes to be allowed to not comply with planning and building rules/laws/regulations that all of us have to comply with.
  • As it is already difficult to exit Paine and Wilkins Streets into Melbourne Road during peak hours, it is likely new residents will choose alternate routes via Bunbury St and North Road, increasing traffic in Crawford, Latrobe, Effingham, and Bunbury.
 Posted by at 10:52 pm
Sep 012010
 

Do you know of the proposal to build…

4 x THREE STOREY BLOCKS OF FLATS

(BUILT OF CEMENT SHEET AND PAINTED BLACK)

CONTAINING 46 DWELLINGS

At the site of the old timber yard, 6 Paine Street Newport.
The proposal is by an out-of-town developer.

You may wish to review the plans and lodge an objection by contacting the council. Or visit the council’s Greenlight system at www.hobsons.vic.gov.au and search for application PA1020902.

Key factors to consider:

  • Three storey buildings plus roof top decking areas.
  • Uncomplimentary design and construction in contrast to Heritage Overlay requirements and unsympathetic  to surrounding building styles.
  • Higher and more massive than anything in the area. Minimal and zero building set-back from the footpaths.
  • Inadequate on-site parking provisions, the developer proposes residents and visitors to park in your street instead, including surrounding the Armstrong Reserve public park.
  • This development presumes to be allowed to not comply with planning and building rules/laws/regulations that all of us have to comply with.
  • As it is already difficult to exit Paine and Wilkins Streets into Melbourne Road during peak hours, it is likely new residents will choose alternate routes via Bunbury St and North Road, increasing traffic in Crawford, Latrobe, Effingham, and Bunbury.

[mappress]

 Posted by at 9:15 am
Aug 172010
 

The Star has written an article. Below is the text in full…

If you view the Star’s article on this page.

Star Image

Traffic trouble … Newport resident Philip Henkil is concerned about traffic and the heritage value of a proposed 46-apartment block around the corner from his house. 51684

By Nicole Precel (17th August 2010 11:07:51 AM)

The three-storey, 46-apartment block proposal for Paine St in Newport is worrying surrounding residents, including Philip Henkil.

“The design is ultra-modern and it’s being placed in a heritage precinct,” he said.

“There’s no compatibility with this ultra-modern design and the precinct.”

He said there were also concerns about parking if there was an influx of residents.

There are 46 parking spaces provided for in the proposal, which includes 18 pit stackers.

But Mr Henkil said this wasn’t enough to cater for apartments that serviced more than one tenant.

“Most families, there’s two cars in this family and there’s going to be three soon, so that’s going to mean people will be parking in the streets,” he said.

He said there were concerns the lack of parking would have a direct impact on traffic considering the size of the streets.

“All of my neighbours will be struggling to find a car park, most of them have on-street parking, very few have provision for off-street, they have no alternative,” he said.

“With 46 units going up on what is really a small block, that’s probably the most significant issue.”

Eddie Zagami, who prepared the town planning submission on behalf of Peter Cahill at Domain Hill Property Group, said he had received an anonymous phone call from a concerned resident.

“He was not disclosing who he was or where he was from, he wanted me to guarantee that when he leaves his property, he would still be able to park in front of his house,” he said.

Mr Zagami said there were 29 two-bedroom apartments and 17 one-bedroom apartments in the proposal. He said according to the traffic report, only one car space was required for each.

“There are three very long street frontages, roads are made for parking on and driving on,” he said.

“Just as the local residents are entitled to park in front of their property.”

He said that from a planning perspective, three storeys on the site would not impact on adjoining properties, were therefore appropriate andhad been deemed appropriate by a heritage consultant.

He said the development was also in line with Melbourne 2030 and Melbourne @ 5 million, with the need for higher density housing to cater for the increasing population without expanding Melbourne’s border.

“This is the sort of development which provides a good entry point to stay and live in the area. Not everyone wants a single house on a single lot, a lot of people do want to live in apartments, and that’s what’s happening metropolitan wide. I think it’s a very good opportunity,” he said.

Mr Henkil said he would be objecting and would offer help to other residents who wanted help with lodging submissions.

To contact Mr Henkil call 9391 5236.
Note: The above text and images by Star (Williamstown, Altona, Laverton) – copyright remains that of the respected owners.

 Posted by at 10:44 pm