Dec 152011
 

The Hobson’s Bay Council has just sent out letters to objectors notifying them of the Council’s refusal of the developers proposal.

Needless to say, many resident objectors will be very pleased.

The cover letter reads as follows…

OBJECTORS NOTICE

Planning Permit Application No. PA1123425
6 Paine St, Newport VIC 3015
Construction of 43 dwellings ranging in height from three to four storeys including a reduction in the statutory car parking rate.

 

After careful consideration of this application and of all objections received, it has been decided to refuse the application on the grounds listed in the enclosed Notice of Refusal to Grant a permit.

The applicant now has a right to appeal against this decision to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT). If an appeal is lodged, you will be advised by VCAT and will have a further opportunity to speak against the proposal.

Should you have any questions regarding this refusal please contact me on 03 9932 1000.

Yours faithfully
Mark Tenner
Team Leader Town Planning

 

WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR THE REFUSAL?

1. The proposal does not meet State Planning Policy, particularly the objectives and guidelines at Clause 15 (Built Environment and Heritage) of the Hobsons Bay Planning Scheme.

2. The proposal does not appropriately satisfy all of the objective in the Design Guidelines for Higher Density Residential Development (2004).

3. The proposed building design represents a poor urban design outcome in regard to the following:

– Upper storey (cantilevered) setbacks to Armstrong Reserve and Paine, Crawford and Latrobe Streets;
– Articulation, form, bulk and scale;

4. The proposal does not meet the Municipal Strategic Statement and Local Planning policy, particularly Council’s objectives at Clause 21.04-1 (The Hobsons Bay Strategy), Clause 21.06 (Residential) and Clause 22.10 (Neighbourhood Character) of the Hobsons Bay Planning Scheme as it does not improve the environment or liveability of the area and negatively impacts on local urban character and the amenity of the surrounding residential areas.

5. The proposal does not satisfy the requirements of Clause 21.07(Heritage) and Clause 22.01(Heritage Policy) of the Hobsons Bay Planning Scheme because it is inappropriately designed and unrelated in terms of design, scale, form and materials to the historic context provided by the surrounding heritage places, most particularly by failing to provide an appropriate graduation of height and setbacks between the proposed new building(s) and the four public interfaces.

6. The appearance of the proposed development with regard to it cantilevered form would result in a poor urban design solution for the subject site.

7. The bulk, form and appearance of the proposed building is inconsistent with the objectives and guidelines of Clause 43.01 (Heritage Overlay) of the Hobsons Bay Planning Scheme because it does not enhance the heritage precinct.

8. The bulk, form and appearance of the proposed building will have an adverse impact upon the significance and character of the prevailing heritage precinct covered by Heritage Overlay – HO27 in the Hobsons Bay Planning Scheme.

Date Issued: 15 December, 2011
Signature for the Responsible Authority:

Mark Tenner
Team Leader Town Planning

 

—————————————————-

REFUSAL TO GRANT PERMITIMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THIS NOTICEWHAT HAS BEEN DECIDED?
● The responsible authority has decided to refuse to grant a permit. (Note: This is not a refusal under Division 5 of Part 4 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987.)
● This notice sets out on the reverse side the reasons for the refusal.
● The reasons or grounds on which the application has been refused are those of the responsible authority unless otherwise stated.
WHAT ABOUT APPEALS?
● The person who applied for the permit may appeal against the refusal. The appeal must be lodged within 60 days of the giving of this notice.
● An appeal is lodged with the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
● An appeal must be made on a Notice of Appeal form which can be obtained from the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, and be accompanied by the application fee.
● An appeal must state the grounds upon which it is based.
● An appeal must alos be served on the Responsible Authority.
Notice of the appeal must be given in writing to all other parties to the appeal as soon as practicable after an appeal is lodged. An objector who appeals must give notice to the person who applied for the permit. An applicant who appeals must give notice to all objectors.
● Details about appeals and the fees payable can be obtained from the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
For an Objector:
● If the applicant appeals against this decision, the applicant must give notice in writing to all objectors as soon as practicable after an appeal is lodged. Objectors will be invited to any appeal hearing.

 Posted by at 5:11 pm
Nov 232011
 

An article regarding the 6 Paine St development has just been published in the Hobsons Bay Weekly.

Article and picture below by Hobsons Bay Weekly.. or go to the article at the Hobsons Bay Weekly website.

Artist's impression: A north-west perspective of the proposed development at the former Newport timber yard.

Newport timber yard plan update still angers

BY GOYA DMYTRYSHCHAK
23 Nov, 2011 1:00 AM

MORE than 200 objections have been lodged against a new development proposal for the former Newport timber yard.

A $9.6million, 45-dwelling apartment block, over three and four storeys (see artist’s sketch opposite), has been proposed for 6 Paine Street.

As reported by the Weekly in April, the developer’s earlier proposal for a three-storey, 42-dwelling apartment block was rejected by Hobsons Bay Council and the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

More than 80 objections against the first proposal were received by the council, opposing the proposed black, cube-like building.

Then in August, the Weekly reported residents felt “blackmailed” by a developer’s letter which indicated that if residents did not accept a new design, a four-storey, 136-dwelling social housing complex could be built without council approval.

The council denied that this was the case.

Resident Anthony Simmons said residents had been “taken aback” by the latest plans.

“The new proposal is essentially the same as the old proposal except it’s increased in size and density. That’s upset a lot of people and there’s a feeling of the process having failed them. They’ve changed the colour, but they’ve packed more people in; the population density is up by about 14per cent.”

The council’s planning and environment director, Peter Gaschk, said officers were still reviewing the application. Domain Hill Property Group town planner Eddie Zagami, acting for the developer, said the increased number of apartments was a “byproduct of the new design”.

“We believe we’ve addressed the design issues and as a result there are a few more apartments.”

 Posted by at 3:02 pm
Nov 202011
 

Great news – at least 200 objections have been lodged against this ridiculous over-development. Well done everyone!

But if you have not yet lodged your objection please be quick, closing date for objections could be any day now.

Below you will find links to the application and information on how to object.

—————————————————————————————————————

Former Newport Timber Yard (6 Paine St) Development

Massive 43 unit development, 3 and 4 stories high.

TIME TO OBJECT

Having previously been rejected by both Council and VCAT, the developer has made another application to council to develop this site.

Despite some minor changes the design remains essentially the same, but has now increased in the number of dwellings and height. The terrible impact on neighbourhood character, heritage, traffic, parking, and park amenity of this development remains the same.

This is what the developer wants to stick in the middle of our neighbourhood…

You can view the application and plans here.

If you oppose this development (and what it represents and sets precedents for) please support your neighbourhood by objecting to it as soon as possible, preferably before 10th November.

HOW TO OBJECT

Here are some aids to objecting, select the most convenient. Each person in your household can submit their own objection.

PRE-COMPLETED OBJECTION (MICROSOFT-WORD or PDF) – containing the most pertinent points and you can use it as a reference for completing the blank objection form or submitting an objection on Council’s planning system (Greenlight), or submit the pre-completed objection form itself.

COUNCILS PLANNING SYSTEM for online submission, go to the bottom of the page for objection form. Review the above pre-completed objection document for assistance and text you might want to use.

BLANK OBJECTION FORM for writing your own objection.

FAX any of the above to 03 9932 1090, make sure you include the following information:
– Application number: PA1123425
– Site address: 6 Paine St Newport
– Your name and address.

POST any of the above to:
Hobsons Bay City Council – Corporate Centre

Town Planning Department (Mark Tenner)

115 Civic Parade
Altona VIC 3018

To speak with Council’s planner about this development, phone Mark Tenner on 03 9932 1157.

If you have any questions of us, please email info@protectnewport.com

Good luck everyone, and let the community’s voice be heard.

 Posted by at 9:38 pm
Oct 252011
 

Former Newport Timber Yard (6 Paine St) Development

Massive 43 unit development, 3 and 4 stories high.

TIME TO OBJECT

Having previously been rejected by both Council and VCAT, the developer has made another application to council to develop this site.

Despite some minor changes the design remains essentially the same, but has now increased in the number of dwellings and height. The terrible impact on neighbourhood character, heritage, traffic, parking, and park amenity of this development remains the same.

This is what the developer wants to stick in the middle of our neighbourhood…

 You can view the application and plans here.

 If you oppose this development (and what it represents and sets precedents for) please support your neighbourhood by objecting to it as soon as possible, preferably before 10th November.

HOW TO OBJECT

Here are some aids to objecting, select the most convenient. Each person in your household can submit their own objection.

PRE-COMPLETED OBJECTION (MICROSOFT-WORD or PDF) – containing the most pertinent points and you can use it as a reference for completing the blank objection form or submitting an objection on Council’s planning system (Greenlight), or submit the pre-completed objection form itself.

COUNCILS PLANNING SYSTEM for online submission, go to the bottom of the page for objection form. Review the above pre-completed objection document for assistance and text you might want to use.

BLANK OBJECTION FORM for writing your own objection.

FAX any of the above to 03 9932 1090, make sure you include the following information:
– Application number: PA1123425
– Site address: 6 Paine St Newport
– Your name and address.

POST any of the above to:
Hobsons Bay City Council – Corporate Centre

Town Planning Department (Mark Tenner)

115 Civic Parade
Altona VIC 3018

To speak with Council’s planner about this development, phone Mark Tenner on 03 9932 1157.

If you have any questions of us, please email info@protectnewport.com

Good luck everyone, and let the community’s voice be heard.

 Posted by at 8:58 pm
Oct 222011
 

Williamstown Ward Councillor Angela Altair invites residents to attend and/or make submissions at the upcoming budget deliberation meeting. Below is a copy of her invitation and PDF flyer.

This is an excellent opportunity for residents to have a direct say in the spend of 2012-2013 budget.

Budget Meeting

In a break from the past, Hobsons Bay City Council has opened up budget deliberations by giving people a much greater say early in the process, inviting public submissions for the 2012-13 Budget until the end of October.

To give you an opportunity to provide feedback in person, I am hosting a Williamstown Ward Budget Meeting:

Where: Williamstown Town Hall Supper Room

When: Monday, 24th October starting at 7.00pm.

Here is your chance to help shape Hobsons Bay’s $100 million annual budget.

• What’s the fairest spend on roads, social welfare, libraries, parking?

• What’s the most pressing issue in Williamstown Ward?

• What big ticket items should we be planning for the future?

Your input will help me when Council budget discussions begin in November.

Budget information will be available and facilitators on hand to aid discussion. Written submissions can also be collected on the night. Tea and coffee will be served.

For details and to RSVP, email aaltair@hobsonsbay.vic.gov.au, visit www.facebook/councillor.angela.altair or call me on 0419 762 267.

If you can’t make the meeting, download a submission form at www.hobsonsbay.vic.gov.au or drop into the Hobsons Bay Civic Centre, 115 Civic Parade, Altona or any Hobsons Bay library branch.

Flyer: Budget Meeting (PDF)

 Posted by at 4:53 pm
Oct 142011
 

Council is in the process of advising residents about the new application to develop 43 dwelling (3 and four stories) on the timber yard site at 6 Paine St Newport. And the signs are posted on the site.

Information and advice on objecting will soon be posted on this site, but if you wish to discuss making an objection please email info@protectnewport.com

Additionally, we will be looking for volunteers to assist in the coming weeks, if you have some time, info, expertise, or resources to offer, please email info@protectnewport.com

 

Plans for the Newport Timber Site are now available at:

https://greenlight.e-vis.com.au/hbcc/public/main.aspx?frm=uc_applicationDisplay.ascx&appTypeId=1&mId=10&AppId=62217

 

 Posted by at 8:21 am
Sep 132011
 

Hobsons Bay Leader has written an article, reporting the developers submission of new plans to council. Below is the text in full…

If you view the Leader’s article on this page, you can place comments on the Leader’s website.

Hobsons Bay Leader article: "New plans for Newport timber yards"

THE developer behind a plan to turn the old Newport timber yards into a multi-storey residential development has lodged a new application with Hobsons Bay Council.

Earlier plans for a 40-dwelling development on the Paine St site were rejected by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal in April, but VCAT member Dalia Cook left the door open for an amended proposal, saying the development was “high-quality”, of “appropriate scale and form” and would not detract from the heritage value of the area.

Ms Cook did not object to the density, but wanted the facades “reworked”. Peter Cahill of Domain Hill Property Group now hopes the changed plans – which include 43-dwellings – will be approved by the council, but a local residents’ group is still opposed to the plan.

Protect Newport spokesman Anthony Simmons said the new proposal did not appear to be much different from the original and had actually increased its possible maximum occupancy.

“It’s disappointing because there was the opportunity for the developer to take on the feedback from VCAT and we don’t believe he’s done that,” Mr Simmons said.

“The development has not been scaled down as much as we would have expected.

“The whole building is now housing more people than before.”

But Mr Cahill said he had taken VCAT’s suggestions on board. “We have done our best to redesign, to address the concerns addressed by VCAT,” Mr Cahill said.

“The result is a group of townhouses which is more conservative in its design and more domestic in its appearance.”

Mr Cahill said the development “moved away from more box form to a design which reads like a group of town houses than a block building”.

A spokeswoman for Western Metropolitan Liberal MP Bernie Finn said Mr Finn had last month written to Planning Minister Matthew Guy regarding residents’ concerns over the proposed development.


Note: The above text and images by Hobsons Bay Leader – copyright remains that of the respected owners.

 Posted by at 7:17 am
Aug 052011
 

Keep us informed if you have written to anyone about the proposed development at 6 Paine St Newport.

This helps us track how the objection campaign is progressing.

Your privacy: The information you provide will not be made public unless summarised and/or your name and email removed.

Whom should I be writing to? See bottom of this page.

[SurveyMe form=’Writers 1′]

 Posted by at 8:32 pm
Aug 032011
 

An article regarding the 6 Paine St development has just been published in the Hobsons Bay Weekly.

It’s an excellent article highlighting how residents around the development reacted to the developer’s letter.

Just a note on the article, we trust readers understand surrounding residents are not opposing the option of social housing, residents are concerned about these key issues:

  1. The ridiculous size and physical impact of the development regardless of it being private housing, social housing, or anything else. Any proposal should at least be sympathetic to heritage overlay zoning and comply with Council’s development guidelines.
  2. Peter Cahill (the developer) using a much larger alternate proposal to concern residents into being more receptive of his preferred plan.

Article and picture below.. or go to the article at the Hobsons Bay Weekly website.

 

Newport apartments or social housing? ‘You decide’

BY GOYA DMYTRYSHCHAK
03 Aug, 2011 12:00 AM

NEWPORT residents say they feel “blackmailed” by a developer’s letter which “threatens” the neighbourhood with a social housing scheme unless they approve of his ‘designer’ apartments.

As reported by the Weekly in April, plans for a three-storey, 42-dwelling apartment block at the former Newport timber yard were rejected by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

More than 80 objections had been lodged with Hobsons Bay Council against the proposal for a black, cement-sheet apartment block.

In a letter dated July 21, Domain Hill Property Group managing director Peter Cahill states that if residents do not accept his new designs, a four-storey, 136-dwelling social housing complex could be built without council approval.

Mr Cahill states that a number of local residents are concerned about the site being potentially developed for social housing.

“Whilst I am prepared to be open and transparent that social housing is a legitimate alternative for us, I wish to emphasise it is not our preferred option,” he writes. “A social housing scheme of 136 apartments over four levels has been designed for the site and presented to us.

“The social housing option – which would normally be approved direct though the state government and not via council – does not preclude us from submitting a separate and independent planning application to council for upmarket designer townhouses.”

Resident Anthony Simmons said many viewed the letter as an ultimatum. “He seems to be threatening or trying to blackmail people. [Residents] think it’s quite an underhanded approach and not going through proper process. We’re feeling a bit under threat.”

Resident John Laurie said Mr Cahill was threatening the neighbourhood with a four-storey social housing scheme unless they accepted his so-called ‘designer’ apartments.

“Threatening the residents of Newport to get what you want doesn’t seem too ethical – or sensible – to me,” he said.

Williamstown MP Wade Noonan labelled the letter “bizarre”.

“I think the developer is adopting a rather dubious approach to this site. Having lost at VCAT earlier this year, the developer now seems to be saying that if they don’t get their way they may move to a plan-B social housing option – it’s quite bizarre.

“The other thing to be said here is that the developer is not correct when they say that a social housing application would normally be approved directly by the state government and not via the council.

“This process was only in place during the global financial crisis to support the Commonwealth government’s stimulus package. To that extent the developer is misleading the public.”

Mr Cahill told the Weekly that while a social housing project would probably be more profitable for him, his preference was for upmarket townhouses.

He denied his letter was a threat and said that Mr Noonan was wrong, based on professional advice received.

“I can’t control how someone can interpret something, nor can I control people’s emotions,” he said of his letter.

“All I can do is be transparent and outline the facts.

“As I stated in my letter, my preference is to proceed with an upmarket townhouse project – not sure I could have made it any clearer.

“My aim was to avoid any confusion so that people do not misinterpret our new planning application.”

 Posted by at 12:54 pm
Aug 012011
 

 

Thank you everyone for coming at such short notice.

Around 60 residents attended a briefing at 4:30pm today at Armstrong Reserve to be brought up to date on recent events surrounding the 6 Paine St development. The developer Peter Cahill, his company Domain Hill Property Group Pty Ltd, or any of his representatives were not invited to attend. This was a residents meeting.

An amazing turn-out considering less than 24 hours notice was given and people had to leave work early to be at the park. This goes a long way to show how much people felt threatened and intimidated by the developer’s Dear Neighbour letter distributed last last week.

Representatives of the resident objectors group presented a brief on events to date, current events, and what needs to be done in the near future to fight this overdevelopment in the middle of a heritage overlay zone.

In summary:

  • A brief history of the previous plans for the site, the council rejection, the February battle at VCAT, and the upholding of Council’s refusal to grant a permit.
  • An overview of a meeting by resident representatives with the developer to review revised plans which will when finalised be submitted to Council as a subsequent application in an attempt to comply with VCAT recommendations. There have been some changes to the plans, but essentially the development is same mass and volume with an increase in number of dwellings, occupants, and height.
  • A recap of the developer’s letter, which hiding behind a clarification that he is not pursuing a social housing of 136 dwellings, clearly implies he still has it on the cards and will consider it if his preferred 43 dwelling building is not readily passed.
  • A gauge of the residents’ reaction to the letter. The letter, its manner and content is quite an extraordinary step by a developer, and viewed by residents as unethical verging on attempted blackmail, and an attempt to corrupt due process.
  • It was clarified by the speakers that the possibility of social housing without Council and community approval/consultation (as stated in the developer’s letter) is in fact incorrect and misleading. Unless it was part of the Federal Government stimulus package which is now exhausted (as confirmed by Local MP Wade Noonan and Federal MP Nicola Roxon Minister for Health and Ageing).

Discussion followed around the following key points:

  • The letter from the developer Peter Cahill was thought to be light on practical information, heavy on the prospect of unchallengeable social housing, and therefore designed to intimidate residents to comply with accepting his upcoming application to construct even more high density dwellings on the site.
  • A project of the nature planned by this developer is detrimental to the neighbourhood character, and will impact everyday resident amenity, especially regarding traffic and parking, both around the site, and beyond into activity centres in Newport and Williamstown.

What residents should do next:

  • Residents should ignore Cahill’s intimidation and write to their MPs, Councillor, and the developer himself. Highlight that any proposal to develop high density three or four storey buildings on this site will be vigorously opposed, and all developments should comply with Council’s development and heritage overlay zone guidelines.

Well done to everyone that participated today.

Who to contact:

Your Local Councillor Angela Altair (Williamstown Ward) at…
Hobsons Bay City Council
PO Box 21, 115 Civic Parade, Altona, VIC   3018
Phone:  03 9932 1044 (during business hours)
Mobile: 0419 762 267 (after hours)
Email: aaltair@hobsonsbay.vic.gov.au

http://www.hobsonsbay.vic.gov.au/Page/Page.asp?Page_Id=3716

Hon Matthew Guy Victorian Minister for Planning at…
Minister for Planning
Level 7, 1 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC
Phone: 03 9938 5990
Fax: 03 9938 5949
Email: matthew.guy@parliament.vic.gov.au
http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/members/id/1611

MP Bernie Finn (Victorian Legislative Council representing the Western Metropolitan Region) at…

Office of Bernie Finn MP
Member for the Western Metropolitan Region
277 Hampshire Road
Sunshine, VIC 3020
phone: 03 9312 1212
fax: 03 9312 4598

http://berniefinn.com/contact.php

MP Wade Noonan (Member for Williamstown and local representative in the State Parliament) at…

Electorate Office:
101 Douglas Parade
Williamstown  VIC  3016
Tel: 03 9399 9022
Fax: 03 9397 7227

http://www.wadenoonan.com.au//index.php?categoryid=10

The developer Peter Cahill of Domain Hill Property Group Pty Ltd at..

Peter Cahill (Managing Director)
Domain Hill Property Group Pty Ltd
Level 1, 49 Smith Street Fitzroy, Victoria 3065
Phone: 03 9419 8588
Fax: 03 9417 3820
Email: info@domainhill.com.au

http://www.domainhill.com.au/advisory.html

 


Keep us informed if you have written to anyone about the proposed development at 6 Paine St Newport.

This helps us track how the objection campaign is progressing.

Your privacy: The information you provide will not be made public unless summarised and/or your name and email removed.

[SurveyMe form=’Writers 1′]


 

 Posted by at 9:30 pm